I have five active disputes with attorneys for breach of contract, the keeping of unearned funds, legal malpractice, etc… I am persuing 6. Two of them needs addressed two separate times. The total of the unearned funds is $22,250.00. The amount lost in earnings as a result is around $150,000. Someday I will update this. Only one is filed with Civil Court so far. The others are going through a refund appeal process first that is quicker.

To see the Nina Docs search GD-26-000425 on dcr.alleghenycounty.us/Civil/LoginSearch.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fCivil%2fFiling%2fDocketEntry.aspx%3fSubID%3d3713612&SubID=3713612‍ ‍

Three should also be concerned with impeding a federal investigation. I would think one would have agreed to my generous offer already with this in mind.

To secure a conviction, federal prosecutors must generally prove two things beyond a reasonable doubt: [1]

1. Knowledge: You knew there was a pending or impending federal matter or investigation.

2. Intent: You willfully acted to hinder, cover up, or mislead the authorities with the explicit intent to obstruct that investigation. [1, 2, 3]

One was once head of the Allegheny County Bar Association and the last thing he did before retiring was prove himself guilty of legal malpractice on me. He then stopped answering all contact despite all efforts and certain Law Jurisdictions getting involved. I feel he will just continue ignoring me and let the court decide what he owes.

He filed a PCRA that did not meet one of the only rules about a PCRA. If this process was done wrong, it would ruin my entire life. (I paid $10,000) When I told his daughter I found out he did it wrong she simply said yep. (in more words) They have ignored me since.

I refused to think there was no solution and eventually discovered through many inaccurately filed motions and petitions how to appeal properly. I had to discover the concept of Nunk Pro Tunk and how the Sixth Amendment (effectively the right to not have my identity stolen) applies to cases where an innocent victim is plead guilty and the PCRA window has closed because of innefective counsel. (Jurisdictional Statement / Notice of Appeal on document section of website)

The one who angers me the most has to explain why an innocent person took an assault charge that cost him $150,000 so far and will continue to charge him for the rest of his life. I will be presenting my income from my Instacart and Uber Eats and proof I was getting my real estate license. I will also be presenting that I am innocent and have suffered a year in jail because of what he refused to prevent etc.. With what I have gone through and can show I feel he looks guiltier than Stanton and that’s not even possible. He is basically going to claim I am a genius and extremely patient when my other earnings dwarf his crime in comparison to the payout. (hence the Itachi v. Donzo label that I was subpoenaed for)